Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Romney's Sissy Walk
Why has there been so little talk about Mitt Romney's bizarre walk? He takes little-bitty strides of a very unnatural sort for a man of his height. That is obvious even when he is shown in isolation. But I recently saw Romney and Ryan walking side-by-side. They traversed the same distance, side-by-side. But Ryan walked with normal, relaxed, manful strides. Romney struggled to keep up, with little-girl steps barely more than half as long and almost twice as frequent as Ryan's. Why is that?
+
It is extremely commonplace for very goodlooking men to be drawn to other very goodlooking men. Is Romney gay?
+
Most very goodlooking men drawn to very goodlooking men are not, however, effeminate. Romney's manner, apart from his sissy walk, is not overtly fem. But his grotesquely inappropriate sissy walk has to make you wonder what is going on inside that pretty, but mainly empty, head.
+
Perhaps like many men tempted toward homosexuality, Romney is adamant about keeping laws (such as DOMA, the so-called "Defense Of [heterosexual] Marriage Act") in place to keep them on the "straight" and narrow. But why would he think that a man attracted to men has to walk like a woman in stiletto heels?
+
(This is copied from my political blog, The Expansionist.)
+
It is extremely commonplace for very goodlooking men to be drawn to other very goodlooking men. Is Romney gay?
+
Most very goodlooking men drawn to very goodlooking men are not, however, effeminate. Romney's manner, apart from his sissy walk, is not overtly fem. But his grotesquely inappropriate sissy walk has to make you wonder what is going on inside that pretty, but mainly empty, head.
+
Perhaps like many men tempted toward homosexuality, Romney is adamant about keeping laws (such as DOMA, the so-called "Defense Of [heterosexual] Marriage Act") in place to keep them on the "straight" and narrow. But why would he think that a man attracted to men has to walk like a woman in stiletto heels?
+
(This is copied from my political blog, The Expansionist.)
Monday, October 15, 2012
Faggoty 'Gay' Characters on Current TV Comedies
Why does almost every TV show that has gay characters present gay men as faggots, fruits, and nelly, simpering, disgusting non-men? It's as tho the people in Hollywood have never met so much as one gay man, whereas Hollywood, and the entertainment industry in general, is filled with gay men. So why the hideous, disrespectful misrepresentation of gay men as would-be women?
+
If there is one gay character in a sitcom, he is almost always represented as a he-she. If there are two, involved, one is normally masculine, but the other is a fruit, so that there is a pseudo-heterosexual couple, one "the" man and the other the "woman". Disgusting. The reality is that normal gay men want a normal gay man, not an imitation woman. Which makes all the sadder the self-despising, gender-confused losers who swish and sway their way thru life, because they consign themselves to a life of loneliness in which no man they are drawn to will have anything to do with them.
+
It is as if every second black character on television were represented as a Stepin Fetchit stereotype, shuffling and jiving thru life, speaking in the laziest of stereotypical black accents, Ebonics on heroin.
+
All the current TV shows with gay characters are grotesquely offensive, even the "Cam" character on Modern Family, who is at least multifaceted and has his normal and masculine moments, as when he confronted and threatened with a beat-down some straight guy who tried to bully "Mitchell" at a gas pump. All these shows must be fixed to correct the offense, or the faggoty characters removed.
+
Maybe straight writers can write straight characters. The current crop of writers on Partners, The New Normal, and the loathsome Happy Endings — in which a supposed gay man spends ALL his time with straight people — sure can't write gay characters. If you can't do it right, don't even try. It is better for gay men to be absent from television entirely than to be represented as psychologically castrated fruits or maladjusted homos who can't stand to spend any time with their own kind.
+
If there is one gay character in a sitcom, he is almost always represented as a he-she. If there are two, involved, one is normally masculine, but the other is a fruit, so that there is a pseudo-heterosexual couple, one "the" man and the other the "woman". Disgusting. The reality is that normal gay men want a normal gay man, not an imitation woman. Which makes all the sadder the self-despising, gender-confused losers who swish and sway their way thru life, because they consign themselves to a life of loneliness in which no man they are drawn to will have anything to do with them.
+
It is as if every second black character on television were represented as a Stepin Fetchit stereotype, shuffling and jiving thru life, speaking in the laziest of stereotypical black accents, Ebonics on heroin.
+
All the current TV shows with gay characters are grotesquely offensive, even the "Cam" character on Modern Family, who is at least multifaceted and has his normal and masculine moments, as when he confronted and threatened with a beat-down some straight guy who tried to bully "Mitchell" at a gas pump. All these shows must be fixed to correct the offense, or the faggoty characters removed.
+
Maybe straight writers can write straight characters. The current crop of writers on Partners, The New Normal, and the loathsome Happy Endings — in which a supposed gay man spends ALL his time with straight people — sure can't write gay characters. If you can't do it right, don't even try. It is better for gay men to be absent from television entirely than to be represented as psychologically castrated fruits or maladjusted homos who can't stand to spend any time with their own kind.
