Sunday, December 30, 2012
Answering Anti-Gay Drivel. Yahoo News today carried a story about a lesbian in NYC who is challenging the refusal of the IRS to grant her a marital deduction on the estate of her lesbian wife, whom she married legally in Canada. As usual, the comments after that story were filled with vile, antihomosexual propaganda. I took some time to answer some of them, and thought the readers of this blog might like to see what I said, both as an example of someone fiting the fools and as models for arguments they can use in their own encounters with bigots, online, in person, or wherever. Here are the remarks that do not depend on the context.
+
There is no such thing as a "gay woman" any more than there is a "male lesbian". The two things are nothing alike, and require two different terms.
*
Society CAN draw lines, even if you can't.
*
Reported as abuse. AIDS does not "spread" from person to person, any more than any other DRUG INJURY does.
*
And your qualifications for determing who is sick? None.
*
Plainly you believe that unless homosexuality is unlawful, EVERYONE will ditch heterosexuality. Not much confidence in your team, have you? The world is OVERpopulated, not UNDERpopulated, and legalizing homosexuality and lesbianism everywhere might just SAVE this planet that straight people are DESTROYING.
*
There is no God, so if your only argument is God, you HAVE NO ARGUMENT.
*
Your violent antihomosexual fantasies suggest you need to be confined in a mental institution and subjected to, for instance, electroshock therapy to rid you of your extreme anxieties about homosexuality, and your baseless hatred for people who have never done you any harm. As for your bestelling novel, the "Bible", it is nothing but fiction. And if the Bible is your only argument, YOU HAVE NO ARGUMENT.
*
Hurricane/Superstorm Sandy was a judgment of God? Against millions and millions of people of all sorts of religions? How about all those tornadoes that strike trailer parks in redneck country and kill YOUR people? Are they judgments of God too? There is something very wrong with someone who wants to believe in a Monster God.
*
You are completely ignorant, as your remark about all gay relationships being role-structured proves beyond contention. NO, THEY ARE NOT! Well-adjusted gay men REFUSE imitation heterosexuality and REJECT role-playing. You know NOTHING but what you read from other bigots, and your "statistics" are fabrications. How do we know? Because nobody knows who is and is not homosexual. The Census asks no such question, so all "studies" are fictitious.
*
She wants the Govt to take no more than it would take if she were the widow of a MAN.
*
Pls prove the existence of God. Then prove the existence of hell. Then prove that you know who will and will not go to hell for which offenses. You are living a life of delusion. Seek professional help.
*
She is willing to pay whatever a widow of a MAN would pay, and not one cent more. You have a problem with that because you are a bigot. Tuf on you.
*
There are straight drama queens and gay drama queens. There is absolutely no relationship between a flair for or concern with drama or theater, and homosexuality or lesbianism. Pls rid yourself of your stereotypes and learn to embrace the REAL world.
*
AIDS is not a disease. Govt keeps talking about HIV, which is NOT AIDS and follows different paths and has different characteristics on different continents, so is not a disease.
*
Your argument is called "reductio ad absurdum". It is called "absurd[um]" because it is ridiculous. That YOU may not be able to draw distinctions and make sensible laws does not mean that society is as inadequate as you are.
*
Nonsense. If she had to pay that much, then there is surely MUCH more that she does NOT have to pay. She has plenty of money. What she does not have is the rights of a widow, and that is what she wants.
*
We will hide our sexual orientation if straight people will also hide theirs and we never have to see them kissing or holding hands on the street or on TV or in the movies. BUT if hets won't hide, we won't either. You don't like that? Well, isn't that sad for you?!
*
This story is about marital rights, not tax rates. But let's talk a bit about tax FAIRNESS, something that plainly doesn't concern you. You would have the poor pay the same rate as the rich. That is called "regressive" taxation, and it is an unalloyed EVIL, a moral disgrace. You should be ashamed of yourself.
*
Strange how "conservatives" repudiate THAT part of the Declaration of Independence ["pursuit of happiness"], isn't it?
*
Stop making up fake "facts". NONE of those people [Hitler, Mussolini, and Tojo] was gay.
*
Gay people do NOT shove anybody's face in anything. How many homosexual kisses do you see on television and in movies and on the street? How many heterosexual very-public displays of affection? Who is shoving WHOSE face in WHAT?
*
No, you are not [discriminated against for being a "white, middle-class, hetrosexual, married male"], and everybody knows you are not, so why are you exposing yourself as a liar? People whose lies are manifest but continue to lie are called "pathological".
*
You are a psychotic anarchist if you really think government does not have the right to tax. Anarchists are very dangerous, and should be watched. Pls post your full name and address so the FBI and Homeland Security can keep tabs on you.
*
You are not the arbiter of sin.
*
If a straight civil union can be called "marriage", then so can a gay civil union or lesbian civil union. If it walks like a duck ... There is NOTHING destructive about calls for gay marriage, any more than there was in calls to extend the vote to blacks.
*
Keep your bearded-man-in-the-sky nonsense to yourself. There IS NO GOD.
*
True Christians believe one thing above all others. It is usually, in English, phrased as "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Think about it. Really THINK about it, and you will see that homosexuals are the only people who follow that to the letter.
+
There is no such thing as a "gay woman" any more than there is a "male lesbian". The two things are nothing alike, and require two different terms.
*
Society CAN draw lines, even if you can't.
*
Reported as abuse. AIDS does not "spread" from person to person, any more than any other DRUG INJURY does.
*
And your qualifications for determing who is sick? None.
*
Plainly you believe that unless homosexuality is unlawful, EVERYONE will ditch heterosexuality. Not much confidence in your team, have you? The world is OVERpopulated, not UNDERpopulated, and legalizing homosexuality and lesbianism everywhere might just SAVE this planet that straight people are DESTROYING.
*
There is no God, so if your only argument is God, you HAVE NO ARGUMENT.
*
Your violent antihomosexual fantasies suggest you need to be confined in a mental institution and subjected to, for instance, electroshock therapy to rid you of your extreme anxieties about homosexuality, and your baseless hatred for people who have never done you any harm. As for your bestelling novel, the "Bible", it is nothing but fiction. And if the Bible is your only argument, YOU HAVE NO ARGUMENT.
*
Hurricane/Superstorm Sandy was a judgment of God? Against millions and millions of people of all sorts of religions? How about all those tornadoes that strike trailer parks in redneck country and kill YOUR people? Are they judgments of God too? There is something very wrong with someone who wants to believe in a Monster God.
*
You are completely ignorant, as your remark about all gay relationships being role-structured proves beyond contention. NO, THEY ARE NOT! Well-adjusted gay men REFUSE imitation heterosexuality and REJECT role-playing. You know NOTHING but what you read from other bigots, and your "statistics" are fabrications. How do we know? Because nobody knows who is and is not homosexual. The Census asks no such question, so all "studies" are fictitious.
*
She wants the Govt to take no more than it would take if she were the widow of a MAN.
*
Pls prove the existence of God. Then prove the existence of hell. Then prove that you know who will and will not go to hell for which offenses. You are living a life of delusion. Seek professional help.
*
She is willing to pay whatever a widow of a MAN would pay, and not one cent more. You have a problem with that because you are a bigot. Tuf on you.
*
There are straight drama queens and gay drama queens. There is absolutely no relationship between a flair for or concern with drama or theater, and homosexuality or lesbianism. Pls rid yourself of your stereotypes and learn to embrace the REAL world.
*
AIDS is not a disease. Govt keeps talking about HIV, which is NOT AIDS and follows different paths and has different characteristics on different continents, so is not a disease.
*
Your argument is called "reductio ad absurdum". It is called "absurd[um]" because it is ridiculous. That YOU may not be able to draw distinctions and make sensible laws does not mean that society is as inadequate as you are.
*
Nonsense. If she had to pay that much, then there is surely MUCH more that she does NOT have to pay. She has plenty of money. What she does not have is the rights of a widow, and that is what she wants.
*
We will hide our sexual orientation if straight people will also hide theirs and we never have to see them kissing or holding hands on the street or on TV or in the movies. BUT if hets won't hide, we won't either. You don't like that? Well, isn't that sad for you?!
*
This story is about marital rights, not tax rates. But let's talk a bit about tax FAIRNESS, something that plainly doesn't concern you. You would have the poor pay the same rate as the rich. That is called "regressive" taxation, and it is an unalloyed EVIL, a moral disgrace. You should be ashamed of yourself.
*
Strange how "conservatives" repudiate THAT part of the Declaration of Independence ["pursuit of happiness"], isn't it?
*
Stop making up fake "facts". NONE of those people [Hitler, Mussolini, and Tojo] was gay.
*
Gay people do NOT shove anybody's face in anything. How many homosexual kisses do you see on television and in movies and on the street? How many heterosexual very-public displays of affection? Who is shoving WHOSE face in WHAT?
*
No, you are not [discriminated against for being a "white, middle-class, hetrosexual, married male"], and everybody knows you are not, so why are you exposing yourself as a liar? People whose lies are manifest but continue to lie are called "pathological".
*
You are a psychotic anarchist if you really think government does not have the right to tax. Anarchists are very dangerous, and should be watched. Pls post your full name and address so the FBI and Homeland Security can keep tabs on you.
*
You are not the arbiter of sin.
*
If a straight civil union can be called "marriage", then so can a gay civil union or lesbian civil union. If it walks like a duck ... There is NOTHING destructive about calls for gay marriage, any more than there was in calls to extend the vote to blacks.
*
Keep your bearded-man-in-the-sky nonsense to yourself. There IS NO GOD.
*
True Christians believe one thing above all others. It is usually, in English, phrased as "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Think about it. Really THINK about it, and you will see that homosexuals are the only people who follow that to the letter.
Tuesday, December 04, 2012
Finally Some Credit for "Gay Pride"
Some readers of this blog will have noted that I say, in the squib at the top of this blog's template, that "I'm ... the guy who in 1970 offered the term 'Gay Pride' as it is now used." In researching the Gay Pride Rainbow Flag recently, I followed a link in Wikipedia to an article where I am finally, or at least temporarily, given some public credit for the term "Gay Pride":
+
The June 1970 march was set in spring 1970 by a committee, the Christopher Street Liberation Day [Umbrella] Committee, of which I was a member, that organized the first annual march to commemorate the Stonewall Riots. The Riots happened to occur in the last week of June 1969, and in spring 1970 the COMMITTEE — not Brenda Howard — named the weekend of events around the first march, scheduled for the last Sunday of June, "Gay Pride Weekend" because I didn't like the first thought, "Gay POWER Weekend", so formally moved for the weekend's name to be "Gay PRIDE Weekend". That motion was duly seconded by Jerry Hoose of the Gay Liberation Front, and then instantly approved by everybody present. There was no discussion and no dissent. I don't recall anyone named "Brenda Howard" even participating in that Committee, much less in that particular meeting. And she played absolutely NO role in the Committee's naming that weekend of events by the host-city (NYC)'s organizations.
+
Bob Martin was also from NJ (West Long Branch). I never heard of him being referred to as "Donny the Punk". His early pseudonym was "Stephen Donaldson". Nice guy, and very nice-looking, but strange. Dead now, from drugs ("AIDS").
+
I used a pseudonym only once, in my entire, nearly 68-year life: a name I thought of using if I decided to pursue a career as an actor, because "Schoonmaker" was very often mispronounced, with an SH-sound rather than the proper SK-sound. I used that pseudonym, "Craig Lee", ONCE, in a letter to, and which was used by, ONE Magazine, an early gay publication out of Los Angeles. When I sought to establish a gay men's organization at City College/CUNY, however, I didn't even THINK of using a phony name, even tho a lot of people had trouble knowing how to pronounce my actual last name: skúen.mae.ker.
+
A close relative gave me grief about using the family name, so I asked my (late) father, from whom we in my immediate family got that (cumbersome) name, if he thought I should change my name. He laffed. That was his actual, instantaneous reaction to the suggestion that I, his son, should change my name. It wasn't staged. It wasn't a considered political reaction to a proposal. He was just startled by what struck him as a totally unexpected, RIDICULOUS suggestion. So he laffed.
+
You've got to love a man who laffs when someone suggests that a gay kid of his should change his name to avoid embarrassing the family. MY father LAFFED. I was never prouder of HIM, nor of being his SON. Thank you, Dad. You really came thru for me when I needed you.
+
Let me tell you something about my father. He was almost 6-4 (six feet, four inches tall). When he lifted you up onto his shoulders, you were nearly in the sky. He never (had to) hit us, because we were "scared to death" of him (but not really "to death", because we knew he would never either actually kill us nor even hurt us badly). Our mother was the ordinary disciplinarian, but it didn't always work. (We were six kids, and that can overwhelm anyone now and then, tho my mother was ordinarily strong enuf to match any challenge.) The oldest brother, Russell (who was at least Dad's height) defied Mom once, and she threatened to beat him with a belt (parents did that, then). He said something like, "What are you going to do, stand on a stool?" That so cracked her up that she didn't take a swing.
+
When I was a very young child, my father worked in construction, and on isolated occasions, we got to go to one of the sites at which he was working to build a house. My older brother Alan proudly regaled us with having seen Dad drive an entire nail clean into a 2x4 with a single slam. And I thought that it would be a great thing to be a carpenter, building houses. I still think that, and enormously admire people who, thru programs like Habitat for Humanity, build houses for people.
+
Alas, if you click on the link for my name in the Wikipedia article, you will find that my enemies successfully had an article about me (that I did NOT write) removed from Wikipedia. They have not YET managed to have mention of me deleted from this article, but they might soon. I think they're waiting until I'm dead, so cannot correct any lies, to try to erase all mention of my place in gay history. They're likely to have a long wait.
+
Fair-minded people might wonder who my enemies might be, and why they hate giving me any credit for anything. Lesbians. Lesbians who deeply resent my refusal to identify as a 'male lesbian' but insist that gay men and lesbian women have NOTHING in common, but are as far apart as people can be without being of different species. I have said this for decades, but have managed to reach only the tiniest portion of the general public. Fortuitously, finally, a few weeks ago the hit ABC sitcom Modern Family made exactly that point in an episode in which the gay couple "Mitchell" and "Cameron" formed three visual grafs showing that gay men and straight men have something in common, and gay men and straight women have something in common, but gay men and lesbian women have NOTHING in common, and do not even remotely like each other.
+
I have nothing against lesbians. But I have nothing in favor of them, either. (I have, in fact, a lesbian niece I am very fond of and get along fine with.) I just want nothing to do with lesbians (that I am not related to), and do not grant them any special favor nor rights over me or other gay men. 'You can go your own way' — and don't bother us.
+
Maybe my lesbian enemies will now redirect their animus from ME to "Mitchell" and "Cam". But it's over. The fraud that gay men have an obligation to castrate themselves psychosexually to win approval from lesbians, who mean NOTHING to them, has been exploded on national TV. To quote something I think I also saw on Modern Family, in regard to some female figure or other, "Begone! You have no power here."
[Brenda] Howard along with fellow LGBT Activists Robert A. Martin (aka Donny the Punk) and L. Craig Schoonmaker are credited with popularizing the word "Pride" to describe these festivities. As LGBT rights activist Tom Limoncelli put it, "The next time someone asks you why LGBT Pride marches exist or why [LGBT] Pride Month is June tell them 'A bisexual woman named Brenda Howard thought it should be.'"That assertion about Brenda Howard is of course a complete fabrication. The account of the main participants in the organizing committee in the paragraf above the one I quote also leaves me out, even tho I offered an amendment (that was accepted: that there should be no dress code) to the original resolution at the Philadelphia convention that approved the march; and some meetings of the Committee may have been held in my apartment on the Upper West Side (as my friend and fellow activist John Lauritsen recalls). John this week actually stated that as far as he could see, the organization I founded, Homosexuals Intransigent!, was the ONLY organization in the United States restricted to gay men ONLY — which is to say, the only HOMOsexual (one sex), not HETEROsexual (two sex) organization in the United States. That is because I founded it, and insisted that gay men are NOT straight and NOT lesbian, and NOT to be defined in terms of others but only in terms of themselves.
+
The June 1970 march was set in spring 1970 by a committee, the Christopher Street Liberation Day [Umbrella] Committee, of which I was a member, that organized the first annual march to commemorate the Stonewall Riots. The Riots happened to occur in the last week of June 1969, and in spring 1970 the COMMITTEE — not Brenda Howard — named the weekend of events around the first march, scheduled for the last Sunday of June, "Gay Pride Weekend" because I didn't like the first thought, "Gay POWER Weekend", so formally moved for the weekend's name to be "Gay PRIDE Weekend". That motion was duly seconded by Jerry Hoose of the Gay Liberation Front, and then instantly approved by everybody present. There was no discussion and no dissent. I don't recall anyone named "Brenda Howard" even participating in that Committee, much less in that particular meeting. And she played absolutely NO role in the Committee's naming that weekend of events by the host-city (NYC)'s organizations.
+
Bob Martin was also from NJ (West Long Branch). I never heard of him being referred to as "Donny the Punk". His early pseudonym was "Stephen Donaldson". Nice guy, and very nice-looking, but strange. Dead now, from drugs ("AIDS").
+
I used a pseudonym only once, in my entire, nearly 68-year life: a name I thought of using if I decided to pursue a career as an actor, because "Schoonmaker" was very often mispronounced, with an SH-sound rather than the proper SK-sound. I used that pseudonym, "Craig Lee", ONCE, in a letter to, and which was used by, ONE Magazine, an early gay publication out of Los Angeles. When I sought to establish a gay men's organization at City College/CUNY, however, I didn't even THINK of using a phony name, even tho a lot of people had trouble knowing how to pronounce my actual last name: skúen.mae.ker.
+
A close relative gave me grief about using the family name, so I asked my (late) father, from whom we in my immediate family got that (cumbersome) name, if he thought I should change my name. He laffed. That was his actual, instantaneous reaction to the suggestion that I, his son, should change my name. It wasn't staged. It wasn't a considered political reaction to a proposal. He was just startled by what struck him as a totally unexpected, RIDICULOUS suggestion. So he laffed.
+
You've got to love a man who laffs when someone suggests that a gay kid of his should change his name to avoid embarrassing the family. MY father LAFFED. I was never prouder of HIM, nor of being his SON. Thank you, Dad. You really came thru for me when I needed you.
+
Let me tell you something about my father. He was almost 6-4 (six feet, four inches tall). When he lifted you up onto his shoulders, you were nearly in the sky. He never (had to) hit us, because we were "scared to death" of him (but not really "to death", because we knew he would never either actually kill us nor even hurt us badly). Our mother was the ordinary disciplinarian, but it didn't always work. (We were six kids, and that can overwhelm anyone now and then, tho my mother was ordinarily strong enuf to match any challenge.) The oldest brother, Russell (who was at least Dad's height) defied Mom once, and she threatened to beat him with a belt (parents did that, then). He said something like, "What are you going to do, stand on a stool?" That so cracked her up that she didn't take a swing.
+
When I was a very young child, my father worked in construction, and on isolated occasions, we got to go to one of the sites at which he was working to build a house. My older brother Alan proudly regaled us with having seen Dad drive an entire nail clean into a 2x4 with a single slam. And I thought that it would be a great thing to be a carpenter, building houses. I still think that, and enormously admire people who, thru programs like Habitat for Humanity, build houses for people.
+
Alas, if you click on the link for my name in the Wikipedia article, you will find that my enemies successfully had an article about me (that I did NOT write) removed from Wikipedia. They have not YET managed to have mention of me deleted from this article, but they might soon. I think they're waiting until I'm dead, so cannot correct any lies, to try to erase all mention of my place in gay history. They're likely to have a long wait.
+
Fair-minded people might wonder who my enemies might be, and why they hate giving me any credit for anything. Lesbians. Lesbians who deeply resent my refusal to identify as a 'male lesbian' but insist that gay men and lesbian women have NOTHING in common, but are as far apart as people can be without being of different species. I have said this for decades, but have managed to reach only the tiniest portion of the general public. Fortuitously, finally, a few weeks ago the hit ABC sitcom Modern Family made exactly that point in an episode in which the gay couple "Mitchell" and "Cameron" formed three visual grafs showing that gay men and straight men have something in common, and gay men and straight women have something in common, but gay men and lesbian women have NOTHING in common, and do not even remotely like each other.
+
I have nothing against lesbians. But I have nothing in favor of them, either. (I have, in fact, a lesbian niece I am very fond of and get along fine with.) I just want nothing to do with lesbians (that I am not related to), and do not grant them any special favor nor rights over me or other gay men. 'You can go your own way' — and don't bother us.
+
Maybe my lesbian enemies will now redirect their animus from ME to "Mitchell" and "Cam". But it's over. The fraud that gay men have an obligation to castrate themselves psychosexually to win approval from lesbians, who mean NOTHING to them, has been exploded on national TV. To quote something I think I also saw on Modern Family, in regard to some female figure or other, "Begone! You have no power here."
